Samuel Huntington characterises civilization in terms of religion. His Clash of Civilizations theory claimed that the end of the Cold War saw an end to ideological organisation of international politics and that cultural and religious identity would now become the organizing principle of future global conflicts. This is the central hypothesis of his work.
Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world
affairs but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. (Huntington, 1993).
Huntington distinguished seven, or possibly eight civilizations Western, Sinic, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and, possibly, African. Religions appear to be the main criteria in his classification and he divided the worlds major civilizations using a series of historical studies. Huntington also claimed in his thesis that the Wests belief in the ability for its values and norms to politically organize the international system based on the ideology of liberal democracy and the insistence on its universality would aggravate other civilizations. In his thesis he also comments on a clash between the West and Islam concerning Western universalism, the belief that all civilizations should adopt values and norms has intensified Islamic fundamentalism, he wrote that a clash between these two civilizations would be the bloodiest conflicts of the early 21st century (Huntington, 1993). The attacks of September 11 on the World Trade Centre and the consequential so called War on Terror, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, appear to support his hypothesis.
The United Nations (UN) also condemned the attack of 911 and the language used in the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights speak of an international community with a particular set of values and norms. The UN charter begins with We the peoples, and what it claims to speak for is a set of norms and values that are understood to be universally acknowledged, and that this is what constitutes the international community (Bromley, 2004). However the set of values and norms that the UN constitutes are often argued to be those of the west therefore represent the interests of the west as opposed to an international community.
The realist theory of international politics depicts that states are in constant competition for power, and whilst power and interests influence what states do and want to achieve nation states avoid the vocabulary associated with power that is connected to the realist model of the international. The discourse of international politics is expressed with carefully chosen words in order to persuade, striking at the heart of citizens. Cultural identity is a basic need, and political leaders of a nation state are the protectors of that states national identity and cultural beliefs, even when a state may be multi-cultural a national culture and identity, its values and norms are generally shared by its citizens. The discourse of politics is to persuade however after the attacks of 911 there is a real threat from terror but it cannot placed at the heart of Islam as not all Muslims have fundamentalism at the heart of their cultural beliefs, Islam after all is a religion of peace. However the threat of terror is apparent and ongoing.
On Christmas Day 2009 a failed attack by al Qaeda on an airliner in the US brought to the table discussions at a conference in London between world leaders concerning Yemens failing economy. A concern of dissent within Yemen and fears of terrorist groups gaining a strong foothold within the nation threatens the western world. The group have initiated a group The Friends of Yemen. The IMF and World Bank consequently based in the US with the ideology of liberalism attached to many of their loans, an ideology proclaimed to have western values, have already leant money to the failing nation in 2006 most of which is unspent. The Friends of Yemen will help dispense the money throughout the country as they feel do not have the capacity to do so themselves. There is an eloquent and careful use of discourse here in the naming of this delegation and there is also reason for substantiation of Huntingtons theory. Intelligence officials have concerns that al Qaeda have an opening to operate in a Muslim country whose people may rebel in times of economic crisis, British officials at the time of writing have also expressed that Western Muslims are travelling to Yemen in search of radicals (Stringer, 2010). This situation highlights the threat imposed by cultural difference on the one hand but on the other hand if the threat is between civilizations the British authorities clearly state that it is Western Muslims who are traveling to Yemen in search or radical clerics.
Edward Said argued against Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations theory. In his response to Huntingtons thesis he wrote The Clash of Ignorance. In it he points out that Huntingtons thesis neglects to include that cultures do interact and do have interdependency, Huntington categorizes civilizations as fixed. There is no room for harmony in Huntingtons thesis as each civilization is self enclosed that it is an imagined geography with no room for movement. A political discourse therefore aimed at ensuring the west maintain a sense of threat and war time status in their minds, a continuity of thought patterns in order to linger the western world in the cold war mind set. (Said 2001).
Said thesis allows room for movements and interaction in a harmonious juxtaposition of cultures. The issue that many Muslims have is that liberal rights cultures are secularized and therefore implicate their cultural identity because of the fundamental need of Islam to live by the Sharia. Global rights become powerful at the local level, when groups and individuals from one particular cultural identity wish to change their way of lives. Huntingtons clash of civilizations theory becomes irrelevant at this point as a global rights culture that is willingly accepted is not confined to regional and homogenous civilization blocs and therefore not a clash of cultures as cultures become willingly altered and shared whilst maintaining their own religious identities. Therefore this confirms that individual community culture can coexist alongside a cosmopolitan culture.
What bind all Muslims are the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. The contestation of ideals between the west and Islam cannot be representative of all Muslims. There are three types of Islamic political orientations, conservative or salaf, radical and militant, reformist and modernist. Reformist Muslims are concerned with rights and democracy and seek to integrate these into their culture, they lobby for economic and social programmes and reforms and wish to incorporate issues of human rights into the Shari a, the religious law of Islam, by reinterpreting religious law to accommodate universal rights and reforms.
Conservatives on the other hand are opposed to universal rights and attempt to persuade governments to develop policy around the implementation and execution of religious law and censorship of all outside cultural influences and products (Zubaida, 2004). For conservative Muslims man-made law is a law made purely out of self intersect. Those who follow the militant and radical orientation also attempt to persuade governments but often through violent action. They take their directive from their own interpretation of the Quran and find all governments who do not practice the application of religious law as corrupt. Sayid Qutb who was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood claimed that any state that lived by the rule of man-made law and not by the law and word of god was an infidel authority.
Huntingtons compartmentalization of powerful cultures into categories such as the Muslim World or Western Civilization generated criticism due to its failure to explain how geopolitical realities existed in socio and economic relations between the US and Saudi for example and how other civilizations such as Turkey as a Muslim country opened their trade barriers and welcomed democracy. Surely this is a contradiction of a clash. His most controversial point was that Islam has bloody borders. He comes to this conclusion arguing that civilization clashes i.e. conflicts are particularly prevalent between Muslims and non-Muslims. He based this on historical context but also believes that contributing factors to Islam being involved in so many fault line wars are that Christianity and Islam are both missionary religions, that the two faiths are all or nothing and that the two faiths and the values of the faiths represent the purpose of existence (Huntington, 1993) .
As mentioned earlier the language that is used in the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights is something that is debated. The word universal implies that there is a single set of norms that is recognized by all Huntington implies that a universal civilization is in fact a Western idea. He states that the values and norms of democracy and rights are associated with the West and that other cultures in relation to this appear to be marginalized (Huntington, 1993). Edward Said argues that cultures do compete with each other and all wish to dominate. What needs to be questioned is whether interactions in the international arena are concerned with self-interest and contests for power on political and economical levels, and whether the institutions in the international system represent the values and norms of the most powerful.
Huntingtons thesis may be flawed however since Huntington wrote Clash of Civilizations a number of events have occurred that appear to add substance to his theoryUnited States invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Bali, London and Madrid bombings, the Iranian nuclear crisis, the conflicts between Israel and Gaza and Israel and Lebanon to name a few.
Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world
affairs but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. (Huntington, 1993).
Huntington distinguished seven, or possibly eight civilizations Western, Sinic, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and, possibly, African. Religions appear to be the main criteria in his classification and he divided the worlds major civilizations using a series of historical studies. Huntington also claimed in his thesis that the Wests belief in the ability for its values and norms to politically organize the international system based on the ideology of liberal democracy and the insistence on its universality would aggravate other civilizations. In his thesis he also comments on a clash between the West and Islam concerning Western universalism, the belief that all civilizations should adopt values and norms has intensified Islamic fundamentalism, he wrote that a clash between these two civilizations would be the bloodiest conflicts of the early 21st century (Huntington, 1993). The attacks of September 11 on the World Trade Centre and the consequential so called War on Terror, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, appear to support his hypothesis.
The United Nations (UN) also condemned the attack of 911 and the language used in the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights speak of an international community with a particular set of values and norms. The UN charter begins with We the peoples, and what it claims to speak for is a set of norms and values that are understood to be universally acknowledged, and that this is what constitutes the international community (Bromley, 2004). However the set of values and norms that the UN constitutes are often argued to be those of the west therefore represent the interests of the west as opposed to an international community.
The realist theory of international politics depicts that states are in constant competition for power, and whilst power and interests influence what states do and want to achieve nation states avoid the vocabulary associated with power that is connected to the realist model of the international. The discourse of international politics is expressed with carefully chosen words in order to persuade, striking at the heart of citizens. Cultural identity is a basic need, and political leaders of a nation state are the protectors of that states national identity and cultural beliefs, even when a state may be multi-cultural a national culture and identity, its values and norms are generally shared by its citizens. The discourse of politics is to persuade however after the attacks of 911 there is a real threat from terror but it cannot placed at the heart of Islam as not all Muslims have fundamentalism at the heart of their cultural beliefs, Islam after all is a religion of peace. However the threat of terror is apparent and ongoing.
On Christmas Day 2009 a failed attack by al Qaeda on an airliner in the US brought to the table discussions at a conference in London between world leaders concerning Yemens failing economy. A concern of dissent within Yemen and fears of terrorist groups gaining a strong foothold within the nation threatens the western world. The group have initiated a group The Friends of Yemen. The IMF and World Bank consequently based in the US with the ideology of liberalism attached to many of their loans, an ideology proclaimed to have western values, have already leant money to the failing nation in 2006 most of which is unspent. The Friends of Yemen will help dispense the money throughout the country as they feel do not have the capacity to do so themselves. There is an eloquent and careful use of discourse here in the naming of this delegation and there is also reason for substantiation of Huntingtons theory. Intelligence officials have concerns that al Qaeda have an opening to operate in a Muslim country whose people may rebel in times of economic crisis, British officials at the time of writing have also expressed that Western Muslims are travelling to Yemen in search of radicals (Stringer, 2010). This situation highlights the threat imposed by cultural difference on the one hand but on the other hand if the threat is between civilizations the British authorities clearly state that it is Western Muslims who are traveling to Yemen in search or radical clerics.
Edward Said argued against Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations theory. In his response to Huntingtons thesis he wrote The Clash of Ignorance. In it he points out that Huntingtons thesis neglects to include that cultures do interact and do have interdependency, Huntington categorizes civilizations as fixed. There is no room for harmony in Huntingtons thesis as each civilization is self enclosed that it is an imagined geography with no room for movement. A political discourse therefore aimed at ensuring the west maintain a sense of threat and war time status in their minds, a continuity of thought patterns in order to linger the western world in the cold war mind set. (Said 2001).
Said thesis allows room for movements and interaction in a harmonious juxtaposition of cultures. The issue that many Muslims have is that liberal rights cultures are secularized and therefore implicate their cultural identity because of the fundamental need of Islam to live by the Sharia. Global rights become powerful at the local level, when groups and individuals from one particular cultural identity wish to change their way of lives. Huntingtons clash of civilizations theory becomes irrelevant at this point as a global rights culture that is willingly accepted is not confined to regional and homogenous civilization blocs and therefore not a clash of cultures as cultures become willingly altered and shared whilst maintaining their own religious identities. Therefore this confirms that individual community culture can coexist alongside a cosmopolitan culture.
What bind all Muslims are the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. The contestation of ideals between the west and Islam cannot be representative of all Muslims. There are three types of Islamic political orientations, conservative or salaf, radical and militant, reformist and modernist. Reformist Muslims are concerned with rights and democracy and seek to integrate these into their culture, they lobby for economic and social programmes and reforms and wish to incorporate issues of human rights into the Shari a, the religious law of Islam, by reinterpreting religious law to accommodate universal rights and reforms.
Conservatives on the other hand are opposed to universal rights and attempt to persuade governments to develop policy around the implementation and execution of religious law and censorship of all outside cultural influences and products (Zubaida, 2004). For conservative Muslims man-made law is a law made purely out of self intersect. Those who follow the militant and radical orientation also attempt to persuade governments but often through violent action. They take their directive from their own interpretation of the Quran and find all governments who do not practice the application of religious law as corrupt. Sayid Qutb who was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood claimed that any state that lived by the rule of man-made law and not by the law and word of god was an infidel authority.
Huntingtons compartmentalization of powerful cultures into categories such as the Muslim World or Western Civilization generated criticism due to its failure to explain how geopolitical realities existed in socio and economic relations between the US and Saudi for example and how other civilizations such as Turkey as a Muslim country opened their trade barriers and welcomed democracy. Surely this is a contradiction of a clash. His most controversial point was that Islam has bloody borders. He comes to this conclusion arguing that civilization clashes i.e. conflicts are particularly prevalent between Muslims and non-Muslims. He based this on historical context but also believes that contributing factors to Islam being involved in so many fault line wars are that Christianity and Islam are both missionary religions, that the two faiths are all or nothing and that the two faiths and the values of the faiths represent the purpose of existence (Huntington, 1993) .
As mentioned earlier the language that is used in the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights is something that is debated. The word universal implies that there is a single set of norms that is recognized by all Huntington implies that a universal civilization is in fact a Western idea. He states that the values and norms of democracy and rights are associated with the West and that other cultures in relation to this appear to be marginalized (Huntington, 1993). Edward Said argues that cultures do compete with each other and all wish to dominate. What needs to be questioned is whether interactions in the international arena are concerned with self-interest and contests for power on political and economical levels, and whether the institutions in the international system represent the values and norms of the most powerful.
Huntingtons thesis may be flawed however since Huntington wrote Clash of Civilizations a number of events have occurred that appear to add substance to his theoryUnited States invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Bali, London and Madrid bombings, the Iranian nuclear crisis, the conflicts between Israel and Gaza and Israel and Lebanon to name a few.